The
book club I attended was a very friendly affair held in the local library’s
meeting room that centered around Stephen King’s body of work. There was joking, plenty of snacking (snacks
provided by a member), and even some planning for other social events outside
of the library. The atmosphere, as can
be imagined, was very informal with no clearly designated leader other than the
librarian in attendance who allowed others to run the discussion, though she
was still clearly there as a resource for planning, book acquisition, etc. The librarian actually bordered on not
participating in the discussion, but this was perceived as an effort to make
sure all of the members (there were nearly 20 in attendance) had ample
opportunity to share. Members took turns
proposing questions, some of which were yes or no, but most of which led to
further discussion. Members also
recounted favorite scenes in the book and compared the book (Firestarter) to the film. Plot twists were dissected and overall
impressions were voiced. There was an
element of “close reading” to many of these observations in which specific sections
of text were used to support members’ ideas about the motivations and
limitations of characters (“Starting a Book Club,” 2015). There were varying degrees of participation
in the discussion by members with some being very voluble. In a shorter meeting this could have meant
some members never got a chance to talk, but I felt that for the most part in the
hour-long session there was time left for everyone to have been given a reasonable
chance to share.
I
liked the focus that the group had chosen because there was clearly some ardor
involved with Stephen King’s works.
Members seemed to really want to be there to talk about a favorite
author even if the chosen book was not something they had particularly enjoyed. There didn’t seem to be any real pressure to
have finished the book and all of the discussion was “gracious” in nature; practices
encouraged in “Starting a Book Club” (2015).
Interestingly,
sort of related to Goldstein’s article about the power of book clubs with
publishers and authors (2005), one of the key events of the meeting I attended
was the reveal and passing around of a signed copy of one of Stephen King’s
newest novels. In many ways this book
club is actually a fan club with the celebrity of Stephen King giving the needed
emphasis to encourage members to attend.
The power of this “theme” could wane over time, but it definitely seems
to have enough draw right now to go beyond the “3 or 4 months” recommended by “Starting
a Book Club” (2015). The good news for
the group is that Stephen King writes mainly in such a popular genre (Horror),
but also in a variety of other genres, that there are lots and lots of
read-alikes out there. If the “theme” of
King ever started to lose power it would be easy for the group to work from
their well-established rapport to branch out to other books. Another positive aspect of having such a
narrow theme is that it contributes to the “gracious” attitude those who
finished the book can extend to those who did not. My meaning is that since the members are less
there for a specific book and more for a specific author, as long as someone
has read some Stephen King, or even just knows who he is, that someone is welcome
(even if for mainly proselytization purposes).
Lastly, I thought the popular nature of the club
worked really well. Sometimes book clubs
lean towards, or at least have the reputation of leaning towards, books more
along the lines of Literary Fiction.
This can intimidate new members or visitors who can feel that some
quality of their intellect is on trial.
Stephen King writes in a way that is accessible and inclusive. All of us have probably enjoyed a good scare
or two in our time. It’s easy for a club
built around King’s works to not take itself too seriously and to have a good
time joking and snacking. What a positive
pastime to pursue after a long day at work on a Tuesday.
Works Cited:
Starting a Book Club. (2015). Retrieved March 08, 2018, from http://www.ilovelibraries.org/booklovers/bookclub
Goldstein, Bill. (2005). Reads Well with Others. Publisher's
Weekly, 252(21), 30-34.
Hi Craig!
ReplyDeleteWow, did that bother you at all that there really wasn't anyone "leading" the discussion? I guess since the readers were huge fans of Stephen King, there really wasn't much of a need to keep readers on track, because that's all they would want to talk about, anyway. At least if the group got off-topic, it would still be on Stephen King!
How do you find Stephen King's endings are compared to Dean Koontz? I heard Dean Koontz can't write a good ending, but wanted to keep both authors in mind when suggesting books in the Horror genre. I've read the Odd Thomas series by Koontz, but nothing by King.
The leader thing worked out well for this group. They seemed to stay pretty on topic, etc. I would think that some groups could wander much more which could lead to frustration for those who did want to discuss the book.
ReplyDeleteI'm sorry, I can't comment on Koontz. I haven't read him and I guess I've only really read The Stand by King.
Craig, it sounds like the group has worked very hard to create a laid-back atmosphere, which is great! My previous experiences with book clubs has been that they tend to be very structured, but what with your description and my experience this past week, it seems like maybe the trend with these clubs is tending to be more lax and laid back. I imagine you do more work with book clubs than me, based on our jobs, so would you say that's pretty true, or are book clubs still pretty defined? and structured?
ReplyDeleteOoh, I don't know. I would have to drop in on more book clubs to see ... I do know that the Stephen King book club is fairly new and even before I visited I had the feeling that it had been designed to be as chill an unstructured as possible. As a newer club it may represent a trend...
DeleteI would attend the heck out of a Stephen King book club. He's one of my favorite authors. It sounds like this was a great book club, and I love that it was hosted at and by the library. do you think it would have been different if it had been in someone's house? How often has this particular group been together?
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteI would have been less comfortable in someone else's house, but then the library is kind of my second home ... I kind of think the group arose out of already existing relationships but I'm not certain of the breadth and depth of those.
DeleteWhat a unique book club! Great observations, full points!
ReplyDelete